A kelson of the creation
Ironizing the big forces and drives in life - love and death, and the fear of both, the kinds of friendships that span years and geographic distance, the jolting surprises of illness or injury or betrayal - is, I think, reflexive to me.
I would like to say it comes from TV, or knowing that most of the parasocial contact points with society at large are fundamentally premised on selling me things or services or monetizing my activities and data to make more effective the effort of selling things and services to me and others who are demographically similar. But that story is too simple, and it’s not mine, and it leaves out a big force that I have been running from for too long - fear and a basic discomfort of being in this always too easily chafed skin. Which I suppose, in fairness, has thickened, if not calloused, as I’ve tumbled and stumbled, climbed and accomplished, fallen and failed.
By ironize I meant take the piss out of things, recoil at sentimentality, make contingent, desacralize the pimping demagogues, and presume that if something artistic is simple or direct it can at best achieve only a false depth because the real and the true are complicated and probably complicit. Selling out is still very much a thing in this Maslovs hierarchy, and the ascendancy of achieving influence as a means to monetize influence makes for vomit in my mouth.
Maybe this is not uncommon. I sometimes wonder who my data-vectored analogues or avatars are, where they live, how closely my legible consumption patterns might predict whether I would like them and they me. I remain naive or simple enough to think that with enough time and curiosity and money, that kind of thread could be pulled and pulled and pulled until it coughed off something meaningful. But presumably anyone who would be consilient would also cultivate anonymity persistently.
Two months off of this hairshirt exercise - which involves some creation, some desire to have a random anonymous encounter leave the reader with a positive impression (I.e., that I’m smart, interesting, insightful, with enough taste or curiosity or curatorial skill to sustain interest, based on a method that relies primarily on poor DIY integration of random art and cryptic navel-gazed commentary) - that two month break has been enough. You can’t know what’s enough until you know what’s too much.
If I don’t create a system I will just be enslaved by someone else’s. Etc etc
All of this is some throat clearing, and a much more personal kind of post to saying, that the beatings will resume so long as morale and readership remain low.